Research project | Updated 03/02/2010 
image

Launched in 1988 following the Single European Act, the policy for economic and social cohesion is today the number-two item in the European Union budget – representing about 35% of spending. The policy benefits all European citizens, through co-financing projects to promote human capital. However, more than 80% of subsidies go to the EU less-developed regions.

Each major step in the EU integration – for example, the enlargements of 1986 (Spain and Portugal) and 2004/2007 (12 new countries), or economic developments such as the achievement of the Single Market or the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) – opened the way to the creation of new tools by the Europe's leaders in order to counterbalance negative impacts on the most fragile populations or regions. Cohesion policy is not a simple mechanism for redistribution between countries or regions; it is rather intended to guide the use of financial transfers towards two objectives: regional development and economic catch-up.

Notre Europe is an active participant in the debate on the future of the cohesion policy, drawing attention to its ambition and its importance as a tool to promote European integration. Notre Europe regularly makes the case in support of the cohesion policy's founding principles – involving solidarity, responsibility and cooperation – and in favour of the policy's social, territorial and political dimensions.

Consult all the publications of the project here.  

1 – Regional development and structural funds





2 – Territorial cohesion and trans-European cooperation




3 – Local development


 




In view
Policy paper by Marjorie Jouen | 12/06/2008
This study presents the historic evolution, content and ramifications of this concept. It analyzes the forces at work in, and the three main components of a territorial cohesion approach—reducing geography-related disparities, ensuring coherence between sectoral policies and strengthening ties between territories. Acknowledging the difficulty of introducing new game rules on the European, as well as national, regional and local levels, it proposes to follow a two-stage roadmap: to adopt various specific measures of limited impact early in 2009 and then to speed up the process as from 2014.
See also
Note by Notre Europe | 19/01/2010
With the Lisbon Strategy arriving at its end, the Commission’s initiative to open a public debate on the future “EU 2020” strategy is more than welcomed. However, Notre Europe considers that the Commission’s paper falls short in providing a strong foundation for a thorough debate on the future shape of the EU 2020 strategy. In particular, there are various points of concern regarding the diagnostic on which the new strategy is based, its content (in terms of priorities and objectives), the instruments and modes of governance foreseen to implement it, and the calendar envisaged to adopt it.
Study by Marjorie Jouen | 27/11/2008
Study realised at the request of the DIIESES and the High Commissioner for active Inclusion against poverty for the Forum on Social experimentation in Europe, November 21-22, Grenoble.
Note by Marjorie Jouen | 27/08/2009
Fabrizio Barca, Director-General at the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finances, has made public the report on reform of cohesion policy1 that he was tasked to write by Commissioner Danuta Hubner. Having mobilised and listened to numerous experts, he delivers a politically ambitious, dense document which goes into the details of technical arguments.
Project leader
Special Adviser to the Chairman of ADETEF, former Member of the cabinet of the president of the EU Committee of the Regions (2006-2008). A graduate in political science (1979), former student of ENA (1989). Research areas: employment policy; rural development and agriculture; EU enlargement; regional development.
Explore further
Note by Marjorie Jouen
18/06/2009