Research project | Updated 26/07/2010 
image

With the publication, in 2005, of an influential paper written by Jacques Le Cacheux (European Budget: The Poisonous Budget Rebate), Notre Europe made a significant contribution to the ongoing debates on the reform of the EU budget, by criticising the dominance of short-sighted national interests on EU budgetary negotiations. The announcement of a comprehensive review on the EU budget, to be held in 2008/2009, has given Notre Europe the opportunity to further its advocacy and research tasks on this area.

It is against this background that Notre Europe has launched a research and advocacy project on the reform of the EU budget. The aim is two-fold:

  • To provide concrete proposals of spending re-allocation for the next financial perspectives;
  • To help shift the terms of the debate for subsequent budgetary negotiations, by stimulating discussion and reflection on the functions and structure of the EU budget and on the principles or criteria that should guide EU spending choices.

At a more general level, the project will serve to promote. Notre Europe's thinking with respect to the reform of the EU budget, in line with Notre Europe's ambitious vision for Europe.

Notre Europe's thinking on the reform of the European budget

Notre Europe views the European budget as a key instrument to achieve EU goals as well as an essential element to help advance the process of European integration. It welcomes reform, which should be:

  • Ambitious in goals. The reform of the EU budget should not be narrowly focused on redressing spending allocation for the next financial perspectives. The goal should be to secure a well-functioning EU budget for the coming decades. In this respect, a broad perspective is required, allowing also a fundamental reasoning beyond what appears to be politically feasible in the short-term.
  • Comprehensive in scope. A far-reaching reform of EU finances requires tackling simultaneously all the elements of the budgetary system-expenditures, revenues and procedures. This is because the most important problems affecting the EU budgetary system have multiple causes and thus require interventions in different sub-fields. Historically, the most important reforms of the EU budgetary system have always been global in scope, and there are grounds to believe that this is the most successful strategy to trigger a major change in EU finances.
  • Guided by considerations of both efficiency and democratic legitimacy. One frequently hears that the present EU budget should be reformed in order to allocate resources better and use them more efficiently. While agreeing with this, Notre Europe considers that the reform of the European budget should also be guided by democratic legitimacy considerations. The legitimacy of a budgetary system derives from the degree of democratic control, that is, the extent to which resources are allocated according to citizens' will. At the EU level, this implies the need to increase the legitimacy of EU budgetary decisions, by making them more democratic and closer to citizens.



In view
Study by Eloi Laurent, Jacques Le Cacheux | 02/12/2009
As Europe prepares to put sustainable development at the centre of its growth strategy for the coming decade, it seems opportune to examine the effectiveness of European action against climate change. The European Union has become the undisputed world leader on the issue, it is true. But the Union's environmental strategy still lacks coherence and even credibility. The powerful economic instruments created by the EU need to be reformed and completed if carbon is to be taxed more effectively.
See also
Philippe Cattoir | 21/12/2009
This paper presents a reflection on the future of the EU budget, with a particular focus on EU financing. The debate on a reform of the EU financing system encompasses two main dimensions: on the one hand, the structure of EU financing and, in particular, whether the Union should be financed via "genuine own resources" or not; on the other hand, the correction mechanisms and the way to either eliminate or adapt them. These dimensions are analysed in depth in the paper. This allows presenting three main medium- to long-term scenarios for a financing reform.
Note by Notre Europe | 19/01/2010
With the Lisbon Strategy arriving at its end, the Commission's initiative to open a public debate on the future "EU 2020" strategy is more than welcomed. However, Notre Europe considers that the Commission's paper falls short in providing a strong foundation for a thorough debate on the future shape of the EU 2020 strategy. In particular, there are various points of concern regarding the diagnostic on which the new strategy is based, its content (in terms of priorities and objectives), the instruments and modes of governance foreseen to implement it, and the calendar envisaged to adopt it.
Policy paper by Eulalia Rubio | 07/03/2008
Has the Commission taken the right choices in preparing the 2008/2009 budgetary review? Despite the fact that the Council mandate describes the review as a comprehensive assessment of both expenditures and revenues, there are hints that the Commission will concentrate on the first. In fact, in the Commission's speeches and documents, the budgetary review is frequently portrayed as a policy-driven exercise to discuss future EU priorities and spending needs. This paper argues that such a narrow focus on expenditures is not coherent with the Commission's ambition to use the review to catalyse a "further-reaching reform of EU finances".
Project leader
Eulalia holds a degree in Law from Pompeu Fabra University (Barcelona) and a degree in Political Science from the Autonomous University of Barcelona, and she obtained a PhD degree in Political Science from the European University Institute in March 2007. Research areas: economic and social affairs, EU 2020 Strategy.