Étude | 17/06/2008 
image
Executive Summary

The agreement signed in 1973 between the then European Economic Community and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), a mere six years after the creation of the latter, was the first interregional cooperation agreement ever entered into by Western Europe as a whole with another foreign regional body. This symbolic importance coupled with the tendency of the EU, as part of its soft power approach to international relations generally, to promote regional integration elsewhere gives a unique significance to EU-ASEAN relations. Yet both the EU and ASEAN are very different multi-dimensional regional entities with quite different histories, objectives, structures and capacities. It is this asymmetry that is at the heart of the difficulties in their attempts at inter-regional cooperation.

This study provides an overview of these relations by examining two intertwined dimensions, namely the political and the economic. Two "flies in the ointment" in the political arena are examined namely, the question of the Indonesian annexation of the former Portuguese colony of East Timor and, a continued source of aggravation, the problem of a repressive regime in Burma/Myanmar. On these two issues European interventionist practice within Europe clashes with ASEAN's sacrosanct principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of a member country.

In examining the economic dimension, the study provides a statistical overview of trade between the two regional bodies and highlights the importance of European FDI in Southeast Asia. However a ‚¬30 billion trade deficit with ASEAN, concomitant with declining European enthusiasm for multilateral trade negotiations has seen the European Union since 2006 seeking to sign a Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN as a whole. At this stage these negotiations seem stalled. With these political and economic stumbling blocks in mind, the study concludes with an assessment of the future of EU-ASEAN relations by tacking cognisance of the disparities in the natures of the two regional entities.




Creative Commons License
This document is made available under a Creative Commons license.

Articles by David Camroux :
    Send to a friend     Archives of this axis
The author
senior lecturer seconded to the Institut d'Études Politiques (IEP), where he teaches about the societies of south-east Asia. Research areas: Asia, regional integration, nationalism and regionalism.
In view
Study by Richard Higgott, Jean-Christophe Defraigne, Heribert Dieter | 09/01/2006
The rapid growth in global trade is no reason to think that regional integration is no longer relevant. That, at any rate, is the lesson to be drawn from Asia, where the search for the causes of the financial and monetary crisis of 1997, and for ways of making sure it does not happen again, has been proceeding in the past few years in a number of different fora. The Kuala Lumpur conference, a gathering attended by the representatives of sixteen countries on December 14, 2005, is just the most recent of such events. This quest has led to a growing recognition of the part that regional cooperation mechanisms plays and will continue to play in the future.
See also
Study by Mills Soko | 18/12/2007
This study completes Notre Europe's series of analyses of political and economic regionalisation trends, with previous papers on South-East Asia and South America.
Study by Heribert Dieter | 07/06/2007
This report on the automobile industry provides a number of insights on the automobile sector, but also on regionalisation processes in general from a comparative perspective. Written by Prof.Heribert Dieter, SWP, as a case study in the wake of Notre Europe's report on regionalisation in South-East Asia.
Study by Alvaro Artigas | 06/12/2006
Regional integration in South America has had a rough ride over the last forty years. Structures for the purposes, be it the Andean community (CAN), MERCOSUR or even the South American Community of Nations born in December 2004, are in place yet regional integration seems stuck in a rut of deep questioning. Parllels with Europe are omnipresent. Where exactly has the dream of a more closely united South America got to?This study is also available in Spanish
Project
Research project