Étude | 29/01/2012 
image

At a time when the adoption of a new Treaty is relaunching the debate on the functioning of the EU, this study by Notre Europe analyses the exercise of the power of legislative initiative by the Commission, which is a key element of the “Community Method”. Written by Paolo Ponzano, Costanza Hermanin and Daniela Corona, this study is the third in a series devoted to European institutions. It enables to answer two essential political issues: how has the exercise of the power of legislative initiative by the European Commission evolved over the years?; Has the role of the European Commission as initiator of legislative proposals really been eroded over time ?

This study aims to unveil significant trends by qualitatively analyzing a select number of innovative proposals adopted by different colleges between 1991 and 2007. For each proposal, it tries to check whether the initial policy goals of the text proposed by the colleges of Commissioners were maintained, and to what extent, until the end of the legislative process. The study systematically compares the achievements of the different colleges in terms of maintaining initial policy goals throughout the decision-making process. In doing so, it can control for the policy domain and legal basis, the evolution of the procedural rules during the period in question, and other contextual factors. 

 

Documents to download:

- Preface by Antonio Vitorino

-Executif Summary  




Creative Commons License
This document is made available under a Creative Commons license.

    Send to a friend     Archives of this axis
Authors
Paolo PONZANO is a senior fellow at the European University Institute and a special adviser of the European Commission. Former collaborator of Altiero Spinelli at the Institute for International Affairs in Rome,he has worked for the European Commission from 1971 to 2009.He was formerly Director for Relations with the Council of ministers, subsequently for Institutional Matters and Better Regulation. He was also Alternate member of the European Convention in 2002/2003.
Daniela CORONA is currently research collaborator at the Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies at the European University Institute in Florence where she completed her Ph.D in Law. She specialises in the study of European decision-making and inter-institutional relations of the European Union.
Costanza Hermanin is a researcher in thedepartment of social and political science of the European UniversityInstitute, where she is about to complete her PhD. Her research interestscomprise EU social and immigration policy, EU institutional affairs, and humanrights and immigration policy in Italy. 
In view
| 16/12/2010
Is the community method still relevant? To give a documented answer to this question, we needed to take a thorough look at how the institutional triangle has changed to accommodate new demands. How does the Commission currently use its right of initiative? Is voting used in the same manner as prior to enlargement? One of the greatest institutional changes in the past 20 years has been the increasing importance of the European Parliament, but what have been the effects of this “rise to power”? This study, like those which will follow, aims to provide an up-to-date picture of the community method at work, and to help us to understand its relevance in today's Europe.
Project
Research project