Étude | 23/11/2011 
image

The Single European Act and the following reforms extended the field of the qualified majority voting within the Council of ministers. However the number of measures adopted since then despite negative votes or abstentions from some member states remains low. This remarkable continuity is one of the main lessons drawn from this study by Stéphanie Novak on the evolution of the qualified majority voting.

The study shows that the driving force behind negotiations in the Council is much less the search for a general agreement than for a qualified majority, that the Council Presidency uses as a weapon of dissuasion towards negotiators who fear ending up in a minority. The latter tend to rally to the majority, what explains the low opposition and abstention rate pointed in the minutes of the Council meetings. The publication of votes from 1993 has not put paid to this strategy because of the role played by the Council preparatory committees that decide behind closed doors. The role of national parliaments to control their governments and improved transparency of the debates and votes within the Council could yet have a stronger impact on the practice of qualified majority voting.

Download:
The Summary
The Table of Contents
The Back cover




Creative Commons License
This document is made available under a Creative Commons license.

    Send to a friend     Archives of this axis
The author
Research fellow at the Hertie School of Governance (Berlin).
In view
| 16/12/2010
Is the community method still relevant? To give a documented answer to this question, we needed to take a thorough look at how the institutional triangle has changed to accommodate new demands. How does the Commission currently use its right of initiative? Is voting used in the same manner as prior to enlargement? One of the greatest institutional changes in the past 20 years has been the increasing importance of the European Parliament, but what have been the effects of this “rise to power”? This study, like those which will follow, aims to provide an up-to-date picture of the community method at work, and to help us to understand its relevance in today's Europe.
See also
Study by Olivier Costa, Renaud Dehousse, Aneta Trakalovà | 02/11/2011
Is the community method still relevant? To give a documented answer to this question, we needed to take a thorough look at how the institutional triangle has changed to accommodate new demands. This study, with those which will follow, is concerned with such questions. Together they aim to provide an up-to-date picture of the community method as practised, and thus to give us a better understanding of its relevance in today’s Europe.
Project
Research project