|
 |
Debate Viking-Laval-Rà¼ffert: Political answers to judicial problems? Europe after Viking, Laval and Rà¼ffert
Speakers's Corner | 18/07/2008  In response to:by Notre Europe The Viking (2007), Laval (2007) and Rà¼ffert (2008) rulings are further
steps in a long history of judicially imposed European liberalization.
From a German perspective, besides the effective liberalization of public
services, the liquidation of the monopoly of the former Federal Employment
Office and restrictions on both public banking and public broadcasting are
noteworthy examples (for detailed discussions, see the writings of Fritz
Scharpf). In its company law rulings on Centros (1999), àœberseering (2002)
and Inspire Art (2003), the ECJ forbid Member States to apply the so-called
seat-of-administration rule (which implied that the company law of the
state in which a firm was domiciled, rather than the law of the nation in
which it was incorporated, had to be imposed on firms) - with as yet unforeseeable
consequences for German supervisory board codetermination.
In October 2007, the ECJ ruled that the Volkswagengesetz that protected
the automobile manufacturer against hostile takeovers constituted an
unlawful restriction on the free flow of capital.
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
The author |
|
|
 |
|