| 11/06/2009 
Iozzo et al (2008) do a great job in identifying the main issues in the EU Budget's expenditures, revenues and decision-making process and put forward an innovative proposal to address these shortcomings. The authors' proposal relies on dividing up the EU budget expenditures in three categories - redistributive, EU public goods and capital expenditures - and having a differential funding structure for each expense class. In doing so, the authors try to link closer together the expenditure and revenue sides of the EU budget and reduce the detrimental effects of net balances on expenditure quality. The paper further recognizes the constraints imposed by the political process in the EU budget where indeed many expenditures are redistributive in nature. It is ambitious in that it foresees the creation of an EU tax and effectively joint issuance of bonds and, in terms of economic efficiency, points at the right direction. Its practicality and its final effect on the distribution of expenditures are less obvious, however...


    Faire suivre à un ami     Archives de cet axe
L'auteur
Chargée d'études à Bruegel sur les questions de développement microéconomique et d'économie publique, elle coordonne le projet sur le budget de l'Union européenne.
En vue
Notre Europe | 16/06/2009
Alors que le processus de réexamen du budget communautaire touche à sa fin, Notre Europe invite quelques chercheurs et observateurs de premier plan à débattre de la proposition de réforme du budget de l'UE avancée par Alfonso Iozzo, Stefano Micossi et Maria Teresa Salvemini dans une note publiée par le CEPS (A New Budget for the European Union?, CEPS policy brief n ° 19, mai 2008).